So the power structures at the moment are largely in, one, primarily the security organs, two, the technocratic state, which is a civil service, et cetera, three, the economic structure, and as we were talking about earlier, cultural institutions, and others. And then individuals kind of work together with others within these structures. The way that the structures are presently arraigned are top-down, very disciplined, in that sense, security structure, which enables one person at the helm of that to generally have an upper hand when it comes to elections, electioneering, campaigns, et cetera.

Yes, yes, we can hear you. So, General, now that you’re here, let’s get right into the discussion. The question of transition in Uganda has been here for a while. I think one can say it started in 2004 and 2005, around the time the term limits were removed from the constitution.

In many places, political transitions often trigger violence or chaos. Andrew, who’s here with us, often refers to Libya as an example, and we’re all aware of what’s happening in other African nations like Zimbabwe and Sudan. When President Museveni came to power in 1986, he spoke of a “fundamental change” and initially promised to lead for just four years before handing power to civilians.

In many places, political transitions often trigger violence or chaos. Andrew, who’s here with us, often refers to Libya as an example, and we’re all aware of what’s happening in other African nations like Zimbabwe and Sudan. When President Museveni came to power in 1986, he spoke of a “fundamental change” and initially promised to lead for just four years before handing power to civilians.